Which model emphasizes collaboration but often leads to isolated program implementation?

The interdisciplinary model emphasizes collaboration among various fields and disciplines, which can enhance the richness and depth of analysis and problem-solving. However, it may lead to isolated program implementation because while different areas contribute their expertise, they may work in silos rather than fully integrating their efforts. This can hinder a cohesive approach, as the lack of a unified strategy may prevent the benefits of collaboration from becoming fully realized.

In contrast, the multidisciplinary model encourages multiple disciplines to address a project but keeps their contributions somewhat separate, leading to a surface-level interaction without deep integration. The collaborative model focuses on teamwork across disciplines and seeks to break down barriers; however, it may also struggle with implementation if team dynamics are not effectively managed. The integrated model aims for a seamless merging of various disciplines into a cohesive program, fostering deeper collaboration and synergy that avoids the pitfalls of isolation in implementation.