Which model was NOT identified as a promising service delivery model for transition-age youth with Emotional Disturbance?

The Individualized Mental Health Care (IMH) model is not identified as a promising service delivery model for transition-age youth with Emotional Disturbance in the context of this question. The rationale behind this is that while individualized care can be beneficial, it may not address the broader systemic needs and supports required for youth transitioning into adulthood. Transition-age youth often require comprehensive support that encompasses not just mental health, but also social integration, employment readiness, and educational continuity, which are better addressed through models that include a wider network of services.

In contrast, the other options have been established as effective due to their holistic approaches. The Wraparound services model emphasizes coordinated care tailored to the specific needs of the youth, integrating family and community resources. Transitional Employment Programs focus on equipping youth with work skills and experience, essential for their independence. School-based Counseling Services are crucial as they provide immediate support in an environment where young people spend a significant amount of their time. Thus, these models align more closely with the multifaceted requirements of transition-age youth facing emotional disturbances.